Warmy vs MailReach
Warmup trial and reputation workflow versus published per-mailbox pricing and bundled spam tests.
What matters for early-stage startups
At an early stage the deciding factors are what the free tier actually covers, what the first paid invoice looks like, and how much of a founding engineer's week the setup costs. Feature depth that only matters at a million sends a month is noise until it is not.
| Priority | Warmy | MailReach |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | 7-day trial, no credit card, 1 mailbox, 15 to 50 seed emails/day | No permanent free plan published |
| Best published rate per 1,000 | Tiers not published in comparable form | Tiers not published in comparable form |
| Starts at | Paid plan pricing is not exposed in accessible official pricing docs | $19.50/mailbox/mo shown in the published pricing calculator |
| DX score | 6/10 | 7/10 |
| Deliverability | Not a sender. Warmup tools can create positive engagement signals, but they do not fix poor consent, bad lists, weak authentication, or irrelevant content. | Not a sender. Helps monitor mailbox reputation, warmup behavior, blacklist status, SPF, DKIM, DMARC, and inbox placement test results. |
| Operating since | Not published | Not published |
| Scheduling | Yes | Yes |
| SDKs | None | None |
| Webhooks | No | Yes |
For a pre-revenue or early-revenue team running a waitlist, a launch announcement, onboarding email, and the first transactional sends, MailReach takes every priority that separates them here (developer experience and webhook coverage), while Warmy matches it on the rest. On free tier, Warmy offers 7-day trial, no credit card, 1 mailbox, 15 to 50 seed emails/day against No permanent free plan published from MailReach. That ordering reflects this audience. Weigh the same table differently and the answer changes.
Side by side
| Feature | Warmy | MailReach |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | 7-day trial, no credit card, 1 mailbox, 15 to 50 seed emails/day | No permanent free plan published |
| Starts at | Paid plan pricing is not exposed in accessible official pricing docs | $19.50/mailbox/mo shown in the published pricing calculator |
| DX score | 6/10 | 7/10 |
| Deliverability | Not a sender. Warmup tools can create positive engagement signals, but they do not fix poor consent, bad lists, weak authentication, or irrelevant content. | Not a sender. Helps monitor mailbox reputation, warmup behavior, blacklist status, SPF, DKIM, DMARC, and inbox placement test results. |
| SDKs | None | None |
| Webhooks | No | Yes |
| Tagline | Email warmup and deliverability monitoring for sender reputation. | Email warmup plus spam testing for outbound teams. |
| Pricing model | tiered | tiered |
| API | No | No |
| SMTP | No | No |
| Templates | none | none |
| React Email | No | No |
| Inbound | No | No |
| Multi-tenant | Yes | Yes |
| Idempotency | No | No |
| Dedicated IP | No | No |
| Best for | Outbound teams evaluating a warmup workflow before scaling sender accounts. | B2B outbound teams that want warmup, spam testing, and reputation tracking in one product. |
Warmy
- ›Official trial does not require a credit card
- ›Trial includes the core warmup flow for one mailbox
- ›Useful for testing whether a warmup workflow fits an outbound team
- ›Paid pricing was not visible in accessible official pricing docs
- ›Warmup effectiveness is debated among deliverability practitioners
- ›Does not replace authentication, list hygiene, or consent quality
MailReach
- ›Warmup and spam testing are bundled
- ›Works with common mailbox and ESP setups that support SMTP
- ›Includes domain and inbox health checks
- ›Agency pricing path exists
- ›No permanent free plan is published
- ›Per-mailbox pricing can scale quickly for outreach teams
- ›Warmup does not fix poor targeting or bad list acquisition