/email-for-startups providers ↗
head to head

Mailpit vs MailDev

Two local SMTP catchers: a single Go binary against an npm install that suits Node projects.

What matters for early-stage startups

At an early stage the deciding factors are what the free tier actually covers, what the first paid invoice looks like, and how much of a founding engineer's week the setup costs. Feature depth that only matters at a million sends a month is noise until it is not.

Priority Mailpit MailDev
Free tier Free, MIT-licensed Free
Best published rate per 1,000 Tiers not published in comparable form Tiers not published in comparable form
Starts at Free Free
DX score 9/10 6/10
Deliverability Not applicable; capture-only. Not applicable.
Operating since Not published Not published
Scheduling No No
SDKs None None
Webhooks No Yes

For a pre-revenue or early-revenue team running a waitlist, a launch announcement, onboarding email, and the first transactional sends, the split is even: Mailpit takes developer experience, MailDev takes webhook coverage. Neither pulls ahead on this audience's priorities. On free tier, Mailpit offers Free, MIT-licensed against Free from MailDev. That ordering reflects this audience. Weigh the same table differently and the answer changes.

Side by side

Feature Mailpit MailDev
Free tier Free, MIT-licensed Free
Starts at Free Free
DX score 9/10 6/10
Deliverability Not applicable; capture-only. Not applicable.
SDKs None None
Webhooks No Yes
Tagline Modern local SMTP catcher. Node-based local SMTP catcher.
Pricing model self-hosted self-hosted
API Yes Yes
SMTP Yes Yes
Templates none none
React Email No No
Inbound No No
Multi-tenant No No
Idempotency No No
Dedicated IP No No
Best for Replacing MailHog in any local or CI email-capture setup. Node-centric local development and CI.

Mailpit

pros
  • Single Go binary or small Docker image with no runtime dependencies
  • Reuses MailHog's 1025 and 8025 ports, so most existing configs work unchanged
  • Views for rendered HTML, plain text, raw source, headers, and attachments
  • Built-in HTML-compatibility check, link check, and spam-score view
  • REST API and real-time inbox updates for automated tests
cons
  • Local development and staging only, not a production sender
  • No hosted or shared team-inbox mode

MailDev

pros
  • Installs with a single npm install or docker run
  • SMTP on 1025 with a web UI and REST API on 1080
  • Optional webhook on new mail for CI assertions
  • Relay mode can forward caught mail to a real SMTP host
cons
  • Vue UI renders modern HTML email less faithfully than Mailpit
  • Release cadence is slower than Mailpit